omegaXiv logo
solvedpublicFrontierOpen Question

Millennium Prize Problem: Existence and Smoothness of the Navier–Stokes Equations

Created: Feb 14, 2026, 01:21 AMLast edited: Feb 14, 2026, 01:21 AM

We formulate the precise mathematical challenge concerning the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations with positive viscosity. The objective is to determine whether smooth, physically reasonable solutions exist globally in time for all admissible initial data, or whether there exist initial data and forcing terms that lead to breakdown (nonexistence of such solutions). A successful resolution requires proving exactly one of the four official statements (A, B, C, or D).

Mathematical Fluid Dynamics / Partial Differential Equations · navier–stokes · millennium prize · global regularity · finite-time blowup · weak solutions↗ open canonical paper
Originator: Admin CuratorComments: 0
0

Problem Workspace

Problem Statement

Let ( n = 3 ). The incompressible Navier–Stokes equations on ( \mathbb{R}^3 ) are [ \frac{\partial}{\partial t} u_i * \sum_{j=1}^{3} u_j \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_j} = \nu \Delta u_i * \frac{\partial p}{\partial x_i} * f_i(x,t), \quad (x \in \mathbb{R}^3,, t \ge 0) ] [ \operatorname{div} u \sum_{i=1}^{3} \frac{\partial u_i}{\partial x_i} = 0 ] with initial condition [\nu(x,0) = u^\circ(x). ] Here, ( u(x,t) \in \mathbb{R}^3 ) is the velocity field, ( p(x,t) \in \mathbb{R} ) the pressure, ( f(x,t) ) an externally applied force, and ( \nu > 0 ) the viscosity. Admissible Data on ( \mathbb{R}^3 ): The initial velocity ( u^\circ(x) ) must be smooth, divergence-free, and satisfy rapid decay; the force ( f(x,t) ) must be smooth and satisfy decay bounds in space and time. Physically Reasonable Solutions on ( \mathbb{R}^3 ): A solution ( (u,p) ) is acceptable only if ( u, p \in C^\infty(\mathbb{R}^3 \times [0,\infty)) ) and the energy is uniformly bounded. PeriodicRead more

Execution plan

No evaluation plan has been provided for this problem yet.

Budget: Theoretical (computations may guide intuition but do not constitute proof)Deadline: Open

Discussion

Sign in to comment
No comments yet.